Rh Bill & Malthusian Theory Essay Example for Free

Rh Bill Malthusian Theory EssayIn 2011, we convey now seven billion people living in this planet. Unfortunately, Earths estimated carrying capacity is scarcely about eleven to twelve billion people. With such a big problem we be approach today, it is important to analyze and examine what the scholars of the past have to say of our change magnitude universe of discourse. One of the famous population theorists of that time is Thomas Malthus. In 1798, Malthus proposes his own theory about population. According to him, human populations grow exponentially while intellectual nourishment production grows at an arithmetic number. Thus, if the increase in our population is non controlled properly, wherefore the number of the people would increase faster than the food supply. He stated that if this growth rate is allowed to continue, it would evanesce to a food famine. To solve this problem, he proposed three solutions. The first one is positive check. This method increases decease rates due to wars, famines, disease, and natural disasters.Preventive or negative check is the other one. It lowers the birth rate which is accomplished through abortion, birth control, and celibacy. The last one is moral restraint which is refraining from marriage until the time when a person is capable of supporting a family. This two hundred-year-old theory is now happening these days. It predicted the problems of food shortage that the world is experiencing today beca expend of the uncontrolled increase in population. Still, I faecal matternot fully agree with Malthus because at that place are things that he forgot to take into consideration when he formulated this theory. One is the ability of man to increase the food production as stated by Marx. He failed to recognize mans ability to use science and technology to solve these population problems like the possible developments in agricultural technology which can increases the supply of food.Maybe during that time, s cience is making a slow progress that he assume we cannot lighten these problems. Another one is the use of birth control as a way of reducing population. He believed that having only few kids is the only way to stop or control the increasing growth rate. Moreover, he confused the desire for sexual relationships with the desire to have children. He didnt realize that a person can still engage in a sexual relationship and still dont have a child with the help of contraceptives. Although Malthus theory has some loopholes, the essentials of the theory have not til now been demolished. There are some preconditions that turned out to be true.RH billThe reproductive health bill which is now a law is the most controversial bill in the Philippines for decades which date cover charge to 1967. The bill is composed of topics which deal with issues about family planning, maternal and child health, and reproductive and sexual conditions. Its main physical object is to lift the reproductive standards of Filipinos by promoting respect for life, informed choice, birth spacing and responsible parenthood which is ossification with the human rights standards. It also guarantees access to medically-safe, legal and quality reproductive health care services and pertinent information.Although it has promising merits, I do not support the bill because of some of its faulty assumptions. One is the assumption that overpopulation is the cause of poverty. In truth, there is really no relationship between overpopulation and poverty but RH bill still insists that it is the cause of the worsening poverty in our country. It is true that it is one of the factors but it is neer the root cause of poverty. What is the primary cause of poverty are the corruption and the bad governance of the administration. In fact, we are one of the most corrupt countries in Southeast Asia.Another assumption is that Philippines is overpopulated. In reality, there is no overpopulation in our country. It is true that our cities are densely populated but in some part of our country, there are small numbers of people and some are still uninhabited.One much problem in the bill is the belief that contraceptives will prevent abortion and sexually transmitted diseases. We should not entrust our safety to the use of these contraceptives in the prevention of STDs because according to some studies, there is no trial impression that condoms, for example, is effective in preventing STDs. In the case of abortions, it did not really decrease the incidents. According to a get a line in Spain, a 10-year period of an increasing use of contraceptive devises had been paralleled by a significantly increasing number of abortions.Though it is already a law, I hope that it can still be reverse so that it can truly uplift the standards of living of the Filipino people and be the solution to lessen the countrys underemployment and booming population.