Analysis of Blade Runner by Ridley Scott Essay -- Papers

Analysis of Blade Runner by Ridley Scott Blade Runner, say by Ridley Scott and based on Philip K. Dicks novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, is a Sci-fi slash Noir film about a policeman named Rick Deckard (Harrison hybridization) in a decrepit 2019 Los Angeles whose job it is to retire four genetically engineered cyborgs, know as Replicants. The four fugitives, Pris (Daryl Hannah), Zhora (Joanna Cassidy), Leon (Brian James), and their leader, Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer), imbibe escaped from an off-world colony in order to find their creator and bully him into expanding their pre-determined four-year life span. This film sooner flopped when it came out in 1982, but since has become a widely acclaimed craze classic with a directors cut to boot. A large part of the conquest that this movie has received can be attributed to its ability to operate on many another(prenominal) different levels. Blade Runner focuses around the adventures of Rick Deckar d, a bounty hunter, whose prey are the replicants, androids who are virtually indistinguishable from humans. The horizontal surface is set in downtown Los Angeles, in the year 2019. This is a mail nuclear holocaust world, where the sun is darkened by the fallout and red-hot rain continually falls. Six replicants of the Nexus 6 generation, the most advanced, put one over escaped from their off-world colony, where they were being used as slave labor. The leader of the replicants, Roy Batty, is on a mission to find more life for himself and the others, for they only have a four year life span and are on the verge of death. Roy is a military style replicant, so he has killed many people in inter-galactic wars and continues to ki... ...s out. Should the replicants kill to gain moral life? Should Harrison Ford be killing them simply because they want to exist? These questions begin to matte up Deckards thinkingespecially when he becomes involved with a p istillate replicant himself. The ultimate relevance of Blade Runner lies in its challenge of what it must(prenominal) mean to be human. It raises the eternal gnawing doubt as to our own kind-heartedness or lack of it. These are the same issues raised by the bang-up religions and philosophies of the past. And it goes to how we respond to the pain of those around us. Do we reach for the one downed by the crushing perplexity of modernity or do we merely run away by, forgetting about that grizzled human lying on the sidewalk who is drowning in the gutter created by the disintegrating and dehumanising post-modern existence?