Mystification :: essays research papers

MystificationIn Bergers essay, he uses the term obfuscation. Mystification is superstar way to set out describing the ways in which people perceive what they see. When people look at same video or advertisement, they perceive and interpret differently. As John Berger says, we are perpetually looking at the relation between things and ourselves (156). We see things differently from one another and in the beginning we see things, but without language and understanding, we cannot exempt what it is we see. The way we see things is predetermined by different factors such as our own experiences and status. Berger provides an example two paintings by Frans Hals. The two paintings are conceive of of a group of governors and a group of governesses. The paintings imply that how our societyhas emphasize an upper class at the period. And, high status people overtop the peoples view. As Berger says, the art of the past is being bedevil because a privileged minority is striving to inven t a write up which can retrospectively justify the contribution of the ruling classes, and such a justification can no longer make sense in modern terms (157). The upper class mystifies us to stay in deem without being able to see things in our own way, we are being deprived from our right to understanding ourselves and placing ourselves in a role of society. The privileged minority mystifies works of art in order to control peoples view. Berger explains how Hals becomes after he painted the two paintings. tally to Berger, he obtained three loads of peat on public kindliness, otherwise he would have frozen to death. Those who now sat for him were administrators of such public charity (158).